posted by System Administrator on 10/02/06
Lydia
Polgreen reported from Abidjan, and Marlise Simons from Paris.
NY Times October 1, 2006
“The smell was so bad we
were afraid,” Mr. Oudrawogol said. “It burned our noses and eyes.” Over the
next few days, the skin of his 6-month-old son, Salam, bloomed with blisters,
which burst into weeping sores all over his body. The whole family suffered
headaches, nosebleeds and stomach aches.
How that slick, a highly toxic
cocktail of petrochemical waste and caustic soda, ended up in Mr. Oudrawogol’s
backyard in a suburb north of Abidjan is a dark tale of globalization. It came
from a Greek-owned tanker flying a Panamanian flag and leased by the London
branch of a Swiss trading corporation whose fiscal headquarters are in the
Netherlands. Safe disposal in Europe would have cost about $300,000, or even
twice that, counting the cost of delays. But because of decisions and actions
made not only here but also in Europe, it was dumped on the doorstep of some of
the world’s poorest people.
So far eight people have
died, dozens have been hospitalized and 85,000 have sought medical attention,
paralyzing the fragile health care system in a country divided and impoverished
by civil war, and the crisis has forced a government shakeup.
“In 30 years of doing this
kind of work I have never seen anything like this,” said Jean-Loup Quéru, an
engineer with a French cleanup company brought in by the Ivorian government to
remove the waste. “This kind of industrial waste, dumped in this urban setting,
in the middle of the city, never.”
The tale of the sludge can
be traced to July 2, when a rust-streaked tanker, the Probo Koala, arrived in
Amsterdam after a lengthy stay in the Mediterranean. Leased by Trafigura, a
global oil and metals trading company, it was pausing on its way to Estonia to
unload what the company said was 250 tons of “marslops” or “regular slops.”
That is the wash water from cleaning a ship’s holds, which would normally be laced
with oil, gasoline, caustic soda or other chemicals.
Amsterdam Port Services, a
waste processing company, took the job, for about $15,000. But as workers
unloaded the waste, they found problems, the company said. For one, the volume
was much higher, more like 400 tons. For another, the seeping fumes of the
waste sickened some of the Dutch workers.
“It was pitch black and had
a heavy stench,” said Luut Planting, a spokesman for Amsterdam Port Services.
“No one had ever seen similar waste.” The company stopped unloading the sludge,
ordered analyses and then informed the Amsterdam city authorities of the
presence of hazardous waste, Mr. Planting said. The material and test results
are currently under seal in the office of the Dutch public prosecutor, which
has opened a criminal investigation. A statement posted on Trafigura’s Web site
says that tests performed on material discharged by the Probo Koala in Abidjan
by a laboratory in Rotterdam showed that the material was not toxic. “Contrary
to speculation in the media and the activist communities about residue washings
in a recent shipment to Côte d’Ivoire, tests conducted by the company and
others show the washings themselves to have little or no toxicity,” the
statement says.
As to the deaths and illness,
the statement says, “It is still unclear exactly what caused the tragedy.”But
the Rotterdam laboratory, Saybolt, has told Dutch news media the samples were
not sealed, not properly marked and not wholly reliable. Lucas Reijnders, a
chemist and professor of environmental science at the University of Amsterdam,
said he had seen the results of an analysis done in Ivory Coast by a lab there,
Ciapol, on samples taken from the Probo Koala before the dumping.
The analysis showed
extremely high levels of caustic soda; mercaptans, a kind of sulfur compound;
and hydrogen sulfide, he said. The last, he said, is a volatile compound that
“smells of rotten eggs, but at high concentrations you can no longer smell it
because it paralyzes your nervous system.”
“It’s
very lethal and acts very rapidly,” he added. The mix, he said, was suggestive
of oil refining. Exactly where the waste originated remains unclear. A
spokesman for Trafigura, Jan Maat, said the Probo Koala had served in the
Mediterranean “as a floating storage tank” and had taken on loads from several
different ships, but he declined to give details.
Reports in the Dutch press said the
Probo Koala had been secretly used as a floating refinery during the summer,
when selling gasoline had become unusually profitable. Mr. Maat denied that.
“This is absolutely untrue,” he said.
After analyzing the waste, Amsterdam
Port Services told Trafigura’s London office that the price to treat and
dispose of it would now be much more expensive, close to $300,000. Trafigura,
which in 2005 had revenue of $28 billion dollars, balked at the cost. “It was
so much higher than the first price,” said Mr. Maat. It would also have meant
staying an extra day, costing $45,000 in port fees and a penalty of some
$300,000 for arriving late in Estonia, he said.
A brief standoff ensued, but the
Probo Koala was able to leave Amsterdam two days later after taking back all of
its waste with the permission of the Dutch authorities. “We have never handed
back or refused waste before,” said Mr. Planting. “But the crux was that
Trafigura refused to pay. If they had, the material would have been treated and
there would have been no problem.”
From Amsterdam, the Probo Koala
sailed to Estonia and took on Russian oil products. After delivering them to
Nigeria, it continued to Abidjan, where it arrived on Aug. 19.
Mr. Maat said Trafigura’s London
office had advised the Ivory Coast port authorities and the Transportation
Ministry that it was delivering chemical waste requiring special treatment and
close supervision, and hired a local company, Tommy. “We were informed that
four companies there could handle it,” said Mr. Maat. “One of them was Tommy.
Clearly this has not been a fortunate choice.” He also said, “We do not
acknowledge responsibility for the dumping of the waste without treating it.”
French, Dutch and British
toxic-waste experts and oil traders said it can be easily ascertained that
Ivory Coast has no facilities capable of handling high-level toxic waste.
Tommy hired more than a dozen tanker
trucks, into which it pumped the sludge. The trucks fanned out, at night, to at
least 18 sites across the city, according to witnesses in several neighborhoods
where the material was dumped, as well as the French cleanup crew.
Several tankerloads went to the
Abidjan landfill, in a community called Akouedo. Residents there are accustomed
to foul odors, but knew something was particularly bad about the new material.
They chased and surrounded one of the tanker trucks, forcing the driver to flee
on foot, witnesses said. In other places, some trucks were simply abandoned by
drivers fearful of being attacked as word of the illegal dumping crept out and
public anger rose. Efforts to reach Tommy by telephone were unsuccessful, and
at least one of its executives has been jailed in Ivory Coast.
Last week Jean-Baptiste Giassey, a
13-year-old schoolboy, rooted through garbage piled at Akouedo, near a team of
workers from Tredi, the French environmental cleanup company that is gathering
up the polluted trash, which is expected to be sent to France for proper
disposal.
Stinking mud oozed from the trash
under his flimsy sandals, coating his feet and legs. He was looking for scraps
of aluminum, which he would sell to traders for less than 25 cents a pound. He
said he had been spending five or six hours a day at the dump, trying to earn
enough money for new clothes. “I don’t know that it is dangerous,” he said. “I
come here every day.”
At first the Ivorian government did
not acknowledge that something was amiss, even though the rank smell was
spreading through the streets of Abidjan. Officials say they suspect they will
find more dump sites than the 18 identified so far." read entire article